횡령등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (the imprisonment of six months, the suspension of execution of two years, and the community service time of 80 hours) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. In light of the fact that the court below sentenced the above sentence to the defendant with due regard to the sentencing such as the judgment of the court below (No. 6 to 8 of the court below's judgment) and there was a history of criminal punishment of the defendant four times for the same crime, and the prosecutor claims for a sentence disadvantageous to the court below due to the reason that the circumstances after the crime were committed, such as aiding and abetting the criminal act committed by the organization of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of this case, and there was no record of punishment exceeding the reasonable scope of discretion because the sentencing of the court below is too uncompared.
shall not be appointed by a person.
Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.