beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.05.25 2016고정1452

사기등

Text

Defendant

A, C, D, and E shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4,00,000 won, respectively.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant D and E’s co-crimes Defendant D are the chairman of the Council of H Producers in Ulsan-gun G in 2012, and Defendant E is the general secretary.

around February 5, 2012, the Defendants conspired to submit a subsidy application and project cost of KRW 41,01,00,000, respectively, to the victim I and the public official in charge of the U.S. office in Ulsan-gu Office of U.S., Ulsan-gu Office of U.S., U.S., and to the U.S. Office of U.S., from March 1, 2012 to March 11, 2012, when holding the “K” as one of the U.S. Seoul Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd., which was one of the public officials in charge of the U.S. office, submitted a subsidy application and project cost of KRW 21,01,00,000.

However, at the time, the Defendants first deposited their own contributions into one’s own money and then returned when the exercise is terminated, and the Defendants were willing to issue a false tax invoice and make the same as all members bear.

On February 17, 2012, the Defendants acquired subsidies of KRW 20,000,000 from public officials in charge of the victimized person to the Doctrine’s account (L).

2. Defendant C and B’s joint crimes are the president of the Council of H Producers in Ulsan-gun G in 2013, and Defendant B are the general secretary.

around February 7, 2013, the Defendants conspireded to submit a subsidy application and project cost of KRW 40,340,000 in total project cost near Mar. 1, 2013 to M, who is a public official in charge of the said victim’s I and the office of the Ulsan-gun Office, and KRW 20,340,000 in total project cost from Mar. 1, 2013 to Mar. 10, 2013 to Mar. 10, 2013, and submitted an application form for subsidies and project cost of KRW 40,340,00, respectively, to the members of the Council.

However, at the time, the Defendants paid their own contributions by priority and return them upon the termination of the exercise, and they bear both members by issuing a false tax invoice, etc.