[2017 Highest 5611]

1. On April 2016, the Defendant: (a) operated P points located in the Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seo-gu P points (the mobile phone sales agency); (b) sold the 11 mobile phone 10,000,000 won to the victim N, a medium phone buyer, a private person, who was in the store without permission of the KTS.

On April 2016, the Defendant calls to the victim at a closed place, and there is a need to pay the phone 11 cost, which was sold by the employees of the Defendant to investigate the inventory of the company.

At the end of one hour, the agency told that it will bring mobile phone to the agency.

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to return the victim again even if he gets 11 phones from the damaged person.

On April 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) obtained the 11-phones from the victim, from the victim, the Defendant acquired the 7,080,000 Arabic value equivalent to the 7,080,000 from the end of the P.

[2018 Highest 377]

2. The Defendant, on December 11, 2014, kept the private document forgery and the display of the relevant investigation document at a mobile phone sales store located in the trade name in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, without obtaining Q’s permission.

The application form for the purchase of a mobile phone, which is a private document on the rights and obligations of the victim Q Q, has forged the application form for the purchase of a mobile phone, by stating “ Q,” “R” on the customer name of the customer, “R” on the date of birth, “B,” “A” on the bank/Account Number of automatic payment of charges, “A,” “B,” “U” on the date of birth,” and “ Q Q” on the customer name of the customer. On the same day, the said application form was issued to the above mobile phone sales store and case employees who are not aware of the fact.

In addition, the Defendant’s cell phone from November 201 to June 25, 2016 is as shown in [Attachment Table 1-13] by the same method.