특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Punishment of the crime
On November 3, 2017, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed A-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed
In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly manipulating the traffic laws and regulations and properly operating the steering direction and brakes.
Nevertheless, the Defendant’s failure to perform such duty of care, thereby finding out the Frocketing car of the victim E (the 52-year old-old driver) who was in the front line at the time of the signal, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as dynasium, tension, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to the shock, and at the same time, went away from the site without taking measures such as providing relief to the damaged person, even if the above rocketing car was damaged to be in excess of KRW 660,251.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police for E;
1. A report on internal investigation (related to investigation for the specific purpose of a suspected vehicle);
1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;
1. Making teas;
1. A medical certificate;
1. Application of the written estimate statutes;
1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime (the point of failing to take measures after the accident)
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The fact that an agreement is reached with the victim on the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the vehicle has been covered by comprehensive insurance, the degree of damage to the victim seems to be relatively minor, and the defendant appears to be relatively minor.