마약류관리에관한법률위반(마약)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding and misunderstanding of legal principles), the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case, even though the Defendant at least did not have any negligence as to the quantity of return, which is the raw material for narcotics, was found guilty.
2. Determination
A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant purchased and sold to C the housing located in the Jinanbuk-gun B in September 2017.
On July 2016, the Defendant discovered p.m. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. 8
As a result, around June 8, 2018, after trading to C, 760 weeks at the E's house per house, and 132 weeks at the E's house located in Jinan-gun, Jinandong-gun, the neighbor of the same day.
B. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the instant charges on the ground that the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone cannot be deemed as having been cultivated, and that there was no other evidence to acknowledge it.
(1) Around July 2016, the Defendant stated that the police had a fin flowers at the village where a house located in the Jinandong-gun B (hereinafter “instant house”) located in the Jinandong-gun, North Korea (hereinafter “instant house”) and that the flowers was spreaded to the finite so that the flowers may take the finite in the next year. However, the Defendant consistently stated that the finite was not aware of all the finites up to the lower court’s ruling.
Furthermore, the defendant was unable to know that his spouse was brain-diseased in 2015, and the spouse was a person who was living in the former week and was living in the former week. The defendant did not know that he did not know that he did not know that he was a person who was to return to the former. Thus, the defendant's spouse submitted.