2...

The defendant B Religious Organization C church (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant church") is a church belonging to B religious organizations (joint) and the defendant D is a member of the church of the defendant church and a member of the church who represents the defendant church as a member of the church of the defendant church.

On November 18, 2016, Defendant D sent the following text messages to the Plaintiff, and Defendant D sent the text messages to the Plaintiff on November 20, 2016, and on November 20, 2016, Defendant D posted the text messages as they were.

1. The Assembly of the Parties to this church (six members of the Council for the Early Candidates for the Fence of the Assembly) passed on the plaintiff as the successor candidate for the Fence.

The final decision shall be made by a resolution of the joint council in which the registration tax equivalentist (which shall be attended first and actually for at least six months) takes part, after the lapse of one year after he/she is appointed, for at least six months.

The officer of the candidate shall be appointed on the first week of January 2017.

The name is referred to in item (g) of this title.

2. The stations and treatment in the letter of apologys of item (g) of the same subparagraph shall be determined at the Joint Council as a successor and have the same level as the sub-chapters until the masters of sub-chapters are held through the delegation formula.

3. (Omission)

4. On January 1, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) was in charge of the education of the youth department; (b) the teachers in charge of the education of the youth department; (c) the teachers in charge of the management of the school building; (d) the teachers in charge of the school building; (d) the school building; (e) the school building; (e) the school building; (e) the school building; (e) the school building; and (e) the school building; (e) the school building; (e) the school building; (f) the school building; (f) the school building; (f) the school building

3. An important issue to Allim church is first presented to the Council when the decision of the Council (a meeting to deliberate and resolve on important matters of a church together with the armed forces of the National Assembly) is made, and it will be discussed and resolved by the Joint Council according to its importance.

This order is neglected, and it is confidential to the executive officers who are the president of the party, for several months, and it is discussed in the armed forces and the plaintiff's construction of the church that requires the construction cost of 6 billion won, and it has been selected at will from the time of the design contract.

In this case, October.