beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.04.28 2016고합195

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was serving for 33 years in the Korea Land and Housing Corporation and served on December 2, 2010 and lives without a certain occupation up to now, and the victim C is between the victim C and the middle school Dong-dong.

On October 2010, the Defendant: (a) purchased a farm to display female life at an instigious place (hereinafter referred to as “the Defendant”); (b) had worked as an executive officer of the Housing Corporation; and (c) purchased the land in an area planned to be developed at a half price.

In order to locate good things, it is necessary to secure a large amount of cash so that they can be purchased immediately if there is a lot of time.

different types.

It will be used to purchase a farm by leaving the money sent and the money in the inside.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the Defendant may purchase the real estate at a low price using the fact that the Defendant had been on his high duty in the Housing Corporation and due to the long-standing foreign immigration living, the victim could use the domestic water and purchase the real estate at a low price.

After receiving the money from the damaged party, there was no intention or ability to purchase the farm with the money from the damaged party because he thought to use the money to invest in the stock market.

On December 13, 2010, the Defendant received transfer of KRW 40 million from one bank under the name of the Defendant from the victimized person to another bank account (D) and acquired property benefits by receiving KRW 573,974,000 in total over 46 times from October 9, 2013, as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, from the point of time to October 9, 2013.

2. The fact that the defendant's defense counsel received 573,974,00 won from the injured party as stated in the facts charged, but it was not received as a pretext of purchasing real estate, but paid as a gift investment fund for stocks. Thus, the defendant did not acquire the above money by deceiving the injured party.

3. Determination

(a) be prosecuted in a criminal trial;