1. As to the reasons for the prosecutor’s appeal, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted Defendant A on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the facts charged against Defendant A, on the grounds as stated in its reasoning

Even in light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant B’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted Defendant B of the facts charged.

Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the status of custodian of embezzlement and the principle of trial of evidence

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.