교통사고처리특례법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
On March 8, 2015, the Defendant, at around 04:29, driven a 25 ton truck truck truck with a stable 25 ton, which is treated as the business, and the Defendant was driving at a speed of about 80-90km each hour, at a distance of about 34.7 km away from the Sindo 34.7km away from the Sindo ri-ri, the Gunn Annex on the Gunn Annex on the instant facts charged.
At the time, nights, and there are many vehicles driving at a speed of at least 110 km per hour, and therefore, when changing the vehicle, a driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to pay more attention to the following matters, since the vehicle driving on the back is at a speed of more than 110 kilometers per hour, and the vehicle is at a speed of more than a speed of 110 km, in the event of changing the vehicle's course, the vehicle's direction, etc. is required to give notice of the change of the vehicle's course, and the vehicle's moving at the right and the right and right and right are well considered, and in particular, in the case of the cargo vehicle, the vehicle driving on the back
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the Frando XG car at a speed of about 150 km from the next side to the next one, and returned to the second two-lane as it is, due to the negligence of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle driving at a speed of about 150 km from the next side, without predicting the flow direction of the truck by the Defendant, and the victim’s truck driving from the first lane to the second lane of the truck by avoiding the truck by the Defendant’s cargo vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim’s death due to the above occupational negligence by causing the victim’s cerebral injury to an external wound, who was sent to H hospitals located in the military G G G G in the same day from 05:13 on the same day.
Facts of recognition
According to the records, the following facts can be acknowledged.
On March 8, 2015, the Defendant is driving a cargo vehicle around 04:29.