손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,00,000 and annual interest thereon from October 15, 2016 to February 21, 2017 to the Plaintiff.
1. On May 20, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order ordering a fine of two million won due to intimidation or defamation on the following criminal facts under the Seosan Branch of Daejeon District Court Decision 2016 High Court Decision 201Da1338, May 201, and the said summary order is the same year.
6.9. Finality was established.
On August 14, 2014, the Defendant paid a deposit of KRW 5 million to the victim A, who operates D Coina in Jina-si C, and was engaged in the business, such as spawn and spawn. A.
On August 18, 2015, on the ground that the victim did not return KRW 429,00, out of the deposit at an influorous place, the Defendant threatened the victim by sending the victim’s cell phone with the word “(10%) stating that the victim would attach the front door to the victim’s cell phone with his/her photographed photo,” and then sending the victim’s cell phone with the phrase “if he/she did not give the remainder of the deposit, he/she would attach the front door at a reasonable place.”
B. On August 22, 2015, the Defendant of defamation in fact presents 10% deposit without any justifiable reason to the Ewitter, “D Co., Ltd. A, the president of D Co., Ltd. or president of D Co., Ltd., and Mari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-Sari-S
Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant injured the plaintiff's honor by the same method as the facts constituting the crime of the summary order of this case, and thereby, the plaintiff is reasonable.