If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On September 5, 2014, at around 00:18, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on “D” front of the “D,” located in Cheongju-si, a party F, a police officer belonging to the Cheongju Police Station E Zone E zone, called the Defendant, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, shouldered the Defendant and asked him of his personal information, and asked him of his personal information. The Defendant sounded that “this ring-in must be followed,” and the victim’s face was frighted at one time by drinking.

The defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning handling of report affairs, and at the same time, the defendant left side of the side, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Work log in the E District and the status of receipt and handling of accidents in the E District;

1. A commission reply letter [defense at that time the defendant had no intention to interfere with the performance of official duties or to injure himself/herself, and thus, he/she is not guilty. He/she may be acknowledged as not guilty in light of the following specific circumstances: F, a police officer, the Defendant’s statement that he/she told the Defendant F ( several times as a police officer) or the Defendant’s statement that he/she told F, such as “I do not have to do so in her natives,” and “I do not have to do so in her natives,” etc.; F, a police officer’s uniform f, and the fact that the Defendant was able to use violence against the victim, such as the Defendant’s behavior and behavior committed by him/her, etc., and how to assess the possibility of the occurrence of the relevant crime, in light of how the general public would have recognized the possibility of obstruction of the performance of official duties or injury, and that he/she had the intent to have the potential of allowing the risk therefrom, at least at the time of committing the crime.

We cannot accept the above assertion.

In addition, above.