beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고정1693

과실치상

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who gets skiings and Skis and Skis are obliged to choose courses suitable for his/her ability to prevent accidents from being caused by collisions with those prior to others, and to take due care, such as skis and skis and skis.

On January 12, 2017, at around 22:30 to 23:00, the Defendant was taking measures, such as cutting off the victim F, who was getting out of the victim F, who was getting out of the victim F, 31 years of age, in the course of getting out of the victim's 5 sprink in Ison on 22:30 to 23:00, the Defendant got out of the victim's right 6 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Land that is sent back to a skiing strawls;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant did not violate the Defendant’s duty of care at the time. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., the Defendant had the duty of care to see the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the Defendant, who was in the back of the victim at the time of ski, had the duty of care to see the progress of the victim in the front and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to see the progress of the victim in the front and the right and the right and duty of care to properly regulate the direction and the speed of the victim. In light of the Defendant and the damaged person’s course and the method of vitality at the time of ski, it was difficult to expect

In light of the fact that the victim does not seem to have selected the course in comparison with the actual ability, it is recognized that the defendant had shocked the victim by violating the above duty of care.

B. The defendant and his defense counsel have no causal relationship between the accident of this case and the injury inflicted by the victim.