(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts;

2. The plaintiffs' claim against defendant E

A. The Defendant D, from around 2005 to around 2009, was a representative of the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) as the representative of the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), and was working as the professor of the J College of I University, and was appointed as the principal of H on August 2009 and retired from office as the proposal of Defendant D around November 201.

B) Plaintiff B became aware of Defendant E at around 2008, while attending the doctoral degree course at I University J graduate School, and Plaintiff A became aware of Defendant E through the introduction by Plaintiff B around 2010, and Plaintiff C was the representative of Defendant E who graduated from the above university (department) on September 7, 2009, Plaintiff B paid KRW 50,000,000 to Plaintiff B for the “I-H” education project, which is managed by F and F, around September 7, 2009. From 2010 to 2014, Plaintiff B invested KRW 50,000 per student who entered or enrolled in H, as dividend, and paid KRW 50,000 per professor’s deposit to Defendant D in the name of Defendant D’s account under the above contract. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 17200, Feb. 16, 200; Presidential Decree No. 17201, Feb. 1, 2007>

3) On May 27, 2010 and June 3, 2010, Plaintiff A deposited KRW 100,000,000, each of the 50,000,000 in the Defendant E’s account. On August 31, 2010, Plaintiff A entered into a contract with Defendant E to employ faculty members, including “A shall be appointed as H’s concurrent faculty professor from September 1, 2010 to August 30, 2013,” including “A shall be appointed as full-time faculty professor thereafter. 4) who was recommended by Defendant E to operate Kapetia from Defendant D and Defendant D on October 15, 2010.