If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On December 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 06:32 on December 3, 2017, at a main station located in the Jung-gu Seoul Central District Office B; (b) on the ground that the Defendant: (c) on the ground that the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Central Franc Police Station C (a police station) who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112, would calculate the drinking value and encourage the Defendant to return home, the Defendant “I Dop

“Along with the desire to take a large volume of voice, the said D’s buck at one time, and the said D’s hand was arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender that interfered with the performance of official duties, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of the said D’s 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. E statements;

1. Application of the CDA-1 statute

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the nature of the crime of this case is not less light in light of the background of the crime of this case and the attitude of the act, on the other hand, the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case by drinking only at the time, and the defendant has no record of being punished for the same or similar crime other than the fine for the crime of light violence on 2002, and all other circumstances revealed in the records of this case and the theory of the change thereof.