2. As to the grounds for appeal, there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant made a confession of all the crimes and repents of errors, the growth environment was poor, etc., resulting in the remaining crimes of this case, which were economically difficult after retirement from the workplace to undergo hospitalized treatment due to depression, etc., and the damage is minor and the damaged goods are returned.

However, in the short term, the Defendant’s nature of crime, such as repeating the same kind of crime against many victims, and the Defendant, who requested formal trial upon receiving a summary order of a fine of KRW 3 million, has already been reduced to KRW 1,500,000,000, and upon examining the conditions of sentencing prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court against the Defendant is appropriate, and its determination is not unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.