Examining the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court and the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the use of force, the exercise of force, self-defense in the crime of assault and assault, or by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.