beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.04.30 2019고단154

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 27, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) or a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) with a fine of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at the Support of the Daejeon District Court in the Daejeon District Court, and on February 13, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million with a fine of KRW 1 million at the Gwangju District Court.

On December 15, 2018, at around 03:10, the Defendant driven a FD car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 8 km from the roads in Seo-gu, Gwangju to the roads in front of the D Apartment E-ground parking lot in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, without a car driver's license, at approximately 0.078%.

2. Violation of the Resident Registration Act and the Defendant forged private document: (a) reported at the above D Apartment E’s ground parking lot; and (b) discovered the facts of drunk driving from the police officer’s slope of the Gwangju Mine Police Station G Police Station that was called out after being reported at the above D apartment E parking lot; (c) discovered the facts of drunk driving; and (d) discovered the identity of H as if he was his personal information, and signed I as I in the name column of the report on the state-employed driver’s statement using a verification-type pen.

As a result, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully, and forged one copy of the report on the state of state affairs, which is a private document related to certification of facts without authority, for the purpose of exercising it.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in Paragraph 2, delivered the written report on the state-employed driver’s statement, which was forged as above, to the police assistant H of the Gwangju Mine Police Station that was aware of the fact, as if they were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of the police officer regarding I;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Inspection of the results of the control of drinking driving (inception No. 16 of investigation records);

1. Registers of driver's licenses (registration No. 22 pages);

1. A previous conviction in judgment: