A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.

Defendant

B and C shall each be subject to the above fine.

Defendant

A and Non-standing Persons are operators of the "F Gameland" located in the Nam-gu, South-gu, Dong-gu, E2(hereinafter referred to as this "the game site") and Defendant B served as a manager of the game machine in this case, Defendant C and D as employees, respectively, in charge of entering points in this case's game site, and customer care.

1. No person who is a defendant A shall distribute or provide game products of any content different from the rating he/she has received for use;

On March 9, 2015, from around 23:20 on the same month to around 23:20 of the same month, the Defendant conspired with a name in collusion, and from around March 9, 2015 to around 23:20, the Defendant left 50 games of the three-party Stoptopto, which was modified with the contents of the rating on the “Stoptoptop” game, where certain points are set aside, unlike the contents of the rating on the screen, where certain points are given, the points are set aside, and the marks are kept in a different form. The Defendant provided 50 games of the three-party Stoptopto which was modified with the contents of the rating on the game machine, and provided the customers with the altered contents of the rating on the game machine to use it, and made the customers accumulate the points acquired through the said game in an inorganic name card so that they can play games again to the degree of the points stored on the card, thereby giving them an equivalent value in the card.

2. Defendant B, C, and D Defendants were in charge of the management of each game machine, input of points, customer reputation, etc. when they committed the same crime as described in paragraph 1 at the date, time, place, and place described in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to replys as a result of appraisal;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Article 44(1)1, Article 28 subparag. 2 (a) and Article 45 subparag. 4 of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry of Defendant A (a person neglected to perform speculative acts).