강제추행
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In full view of the consistent statements made by the victim in the summary of the grounds for appeal, the fact that the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, even though the defendant could be found to have committed an indecent act, considering the following day after the occurrence of the case, and the victim retired from his farm and notified the counseling center of the damage, the court below acquitted the
2. Determination
A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s determination as to Article 1 of the facts charged and by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, ① the victim made a statement of the damage by calls to the Counseling Center three days after the occurrence of the case, and the Defendant was not a minor indecent act if her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her sens
B. The circumstances of the lower court’s determination as to Article 2 of the facts charged and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, ① the victim stated at the counseling center that “the Defendant met the Defendant, etc. and knife his hand, and knife his hand,” and the counselor gave advice to the police that “the Defendant reported to the police by taking medical treatment and receiving a medical certificate” (Evidence No. 57 pages of the evidence record), and the investigative agency and the court did not at all assert any assertion that the Defendant had sold to the police (Evidence No. 57 pages of the evidence record), and that “the Defendant tried to use both arms.”