If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. On January 15, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who received a traffic accident report at the 244-year installment savings of the members of Ansan-si on March 15, 2018, and at the entrance of Chungcheong-si, and received inquiries from the police officers belonging to the Gyeonggi-si Police Station B police box belonging to the Gyeonggi-do Police Station B police box to ask questions about the personal information and the circumstances of the instant case, “I will know why this spaws, internal contact address are given.”

In doing so, I tried to see this Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On January 15, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested and detained in the Gyeonggi E police box of the Gyeonggi E Police Station of the Gyeonggi E-gu, Ansan-si on the 15th day of Jan. 15, 2018; and (b) was under the influence of alcohol while being compelled to commit an act in the act of committing an offense, and was unable to avoid disturbance, such as passing through sound.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the revocation of official duties), and the choice of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (to the extent that the aggregate of the amounts of two crimes) shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is deemed to be disadvantageous to the nature of the crime.

However, the fact that the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant, the first offender, the degree of tangible force inflicted on the body of the victimized police officer, and other records are shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case.