On July 2, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car on July 2, 2015, and tried to make an internship while driving the two-lanes of the three-lane front of the cross-city bus garage in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju at a speed on the city speed from the offline of the car to the offline at a speed on the city speed.

Since a central line has been installed and the passage of vehicles is frequent, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to make an intern in an area where a U.S. can be a U.S., after reducing speed and driving safely as a person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the victim D (the 60-year-old) driving with one-lane in the same direction when he neglected this and tried to make a full-time U-turn, was selected as the front part before the left side of the above taxi, and the above victim suffered about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. In light of the judgment, the accident of this case is not a case where the defendant, while driving a two-lane on the road of this case, changed the two-lane to a one-lane for the purpose of harming the central line and driving a one-lane. The accident of this case is not a case where the defendant invadeds the central line in violation of Article 13(3) of the Road Traffic Act, or crosses, is in violation of Article 62 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Article 19(3) of the Road Traffic Act). The accident of this case is a case where the defendant breached his duty of care when he changes the two-lanes in the two-lanes of the road of this case, and is a case where he is in violation of Article 19(3) of the Road Traffic Act.

Therefore, the charge of this case is a crime falling under Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, which has caused a traffic accident under the main sentence of Article 4 (1) of the same Act.