2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court’s judgment, and where the sentencing of the lower court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The lower court determined the sentence against the Defendant by comprehensively taking account of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant and unfavorable conditions

The circumstances asserted by the prosecutor on the grounds of appeal (such as the seriousness of crime, the fact that the electronic financial transaction access media transferred by the defendant is exploited for fraud crimes, the transfer of such media has two access media, and the damage has not yet been recovered) seems to have already been taken into account in the sentencing process of the court below.

In addition, there is no new change in circumstances that can change the sentence of the court below in the first instance court.

When comprehensively taking into account the sentencing conditions, such as the character, conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, as shown in the deliberation of the court below and the party concerned, the sentence of the court below is excessive beyond the reasonable scope of discretion and it cannot be deemed unfair.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the prosecutor's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.