대여금등
1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, to the Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A: 14,075,910 won and 12,919 among them.
In full view of the purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number of branch numbers), the plaintiff extended loans to D on March 8, 2012, with a loan limit of KRW 13 million (in the amount of KRW 30 million), interest rate of KRW 6.4% per annum, interest rate of KRW 15.04% per annum, delayed interest rate of KRW 15.04% per annum, and period of maturity of March 8, 2014; the outstanding amount of the above loans was 30,14,908; D died on August 7, 2015; and C succeeded to the property of Defendant A and his children, who were his wife; the Defendants inherited the property under the Daegu Family Court’s order of KRW 2018,281,208,2015.
Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money and delay damages as stated in each order of the Defendants’ respective shares out of the outstanding loans within the scope of the property inherited from D.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is accepted for all reasons, and it is decided as per Disposition.