A. Although the Defendant did not commit an indecent act with the victim’s her her her m, the Defendant was aware of his her her her son’s her son’s her her her her her her her her her son’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (such as imprisonment with prison labor for six months, 120 hours, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. The Defendant alleged that the above facts were the same as the above facts in the court below, and the court below rejected the above argument in detail, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below and the court below, ① the Defendant asserted that he did not have a friendly relationship with another friendly body, and she went alone with the investigation agency and the court below (the 36th page of the investigation records and the 11th page of the trial records). The Defendant did not want to take a photograph on the ground that she tried to take a panpande of the E in the court below, and she did not want to take a photograph on the ground that she tried to take a her pande, and she did not want to take a witness Gdo of the court of the first instance who was a security officer of the contact in the instant case, to take the witness stand in the first floor at the place of public performance and to take the witness stand in the part of the Defendant’s testimony that he was a direct indecent act.

B. The Defendant had been punished several times for the same type of crime, even though he/she had a record of judgment on the illegal sentencing.