However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 18, 2013, the Defendant driven C Village Bus around 09:22, and led the Defendant to drive the C Village Bus in accordance with one way among two-lanes of two-lanes from the room of the business office of registration of a commercial distance vehicle in front of the commercial distance vehicle located in the west-gu, Sungnam-si.

Since a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly drive in accordance with good faith and good faith.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above duty of care and did not discover the victim D (ma, 46 years old) driving a bicycle on the left side from the right side of the intersection to the left side of the intersection in accordance with the new signals by negligence in violation of the above duty of care and received the same village bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim of approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, including us cages at us fages, which include two cages at the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The suspended execution is covered by the comprehensive insurance for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

The agreement was reached with the victim.

All these points shall be considered and the same type as the order shall be determined.