If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

The defendant is a person who has been employed as an auditor of the building management group comprised of merchants entering the building C in South Yangju City.

1. On January 17, 2017, at around 17:00, the Defendant damaged the property by removing the “co-rating instruction” in which the victim D, the head of the building management office, was attached to the entrance door of the above ES room for the purpose of controlling access by the victim D, who is the head of the building management office (such as electricity, etc.).

2. The Defendant, while intending to have access to the EPS room at the date, time, place, etc. described in paragraph 1, was prevented from victim D.

The Defendant, at the place of five to six persons, including the president, staff of the management office, and the occupant of the six-story commercial buildings, has “I am fe. I amfe. I amfe. I amfe.”

In other words, the victim was sexually insultingd by openly booming her father, such as her flick, and her flick.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Recording notes;

1. Reference photographs;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;