소유권말소등기
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed in entirety.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal.
1. The first instance court dismissed the plaintiff's primary claim and accepted the conjunctive claim, and the scope of this court's trial is limited to the primary claim.
2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following “the part which was used after the first instance,” thereby citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (excluding the part concerning the preliminary claim against Defendant B, which is not included in the scope of the judgment of this court). 3. The part which was used by the first instance court, “the result of inquiry into each fact about the head of this court’s P Hospital and Qua hospital” in the first part of the judgment of first instance, “the result of inquiry into each fact about the head of the P Hospital and Qua hospital in the first instance court’s P hospital.”
Part IV of the judgment of the court of first instance (2) No. 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter referred to as "the judgment") is as follows.
② On December 4, 2017, the deceased received 16 points out of 30 points out of 16 points out of 16 points out of 30 points in a simple dementia examination (MME-K) conducted by the above Q convalescent, and the above prosecutor different criteria for additional inspections following the education and training of the persons to be inspected. If the education and training period is not more than three years, 75 points to 79 years of age and 17 years of age and 80 years of age and 16 points to 16 years of age are as follows.
9) On February 24, 2017, the deceased stated that "the results of inquiries about the witness S testimony, the head of the P hospital in the first instance court, and the head of Q2 hospital" as "the results of inquiries about each fact about the witness S testimony, the head of the P hospital in the second instance court, and the head of Q2 hospital" in the first instance judgment, "the result of inquiry about each fact about the head of Q2 hospital" was found to be "the witness S testimony, the head of this court's P hospital in the second instance court, and the head of Q2 hospital in the second instance."
Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance (1) No. 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows.
(9) The net has received points similar to the standard points and has been in need of an additional dementia inspection.