However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 17, 2015, at around 01:35, the Defendant, at the time of Kimpo-si, sent to the site after receiving a report of violence in front of the “C” located in Kimpo-si, and tried to confirm the circumstances of the case, assaulted a slope affiliated with the D District Unit of the Kimpo-gu Police Station, “Ye Y Y Y Y Y YY YY Y YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY YY Y

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Place of work, and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confessions of crimes and reflects on the nature of crimes, the extent of damage by police officers suffering from the same kind of crime, the absence of criminal records of the same kind, and other factors such as sentencing conditions, etc. prescribed by

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;