전자금융거래법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On April 7, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received a request from a person whose name is unknown to send a passbook to a mobile phone; and (b) transferred the means of access to electronic financial transactions to a person who was waiting for a bus terminal in the city where the passbook was sent, via C, a taxi engineer, a taxi engineer, who was known in the city of Pyeongtaek-gun, around April 10, 2014, via a taxi operator, who was in the city of Pyeongtaek-gun; (c) the passbook bank account in the name of the Defendant (Account D) and a post office account account (Account Number E) and a bank account (Account Number E).
2. The Defendant stated to the effect that he/she had the head of the Tong and the cash card delivered to an investigative agency and the person whose name is unknown by the telephone to allow him/her to get loans under this law.
According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the Nonghyup Bank account in the name of the defendant and the post office account used for the crime of telephone financial fraud on April 10, 2014, and the defendant delivered the passbook and cash card to a person whose name is unknown at the investigative agency as well as the certificate of the personal seal impression with the farmland ledger while delivering the passbook and cash card to the person whose name is not known at the investigative agency, but the defendant was issued one copy of the certificate of the personal seal impression only once on April 17, 2014 between January 1, 2014 and September 23, 2014, and the defendant was issued one copy of the certificate of the personal seal impression impression on October 23, 209, and the fact that the defendant was sentenced to one year of suspended sentence for two months due to the crime of fraud in the Gwangju District Court Branch branch on October 23,
However, according to each fact-finding inquiry reply to the Nonghyup Bank and Korea Post, the account opened on July 13, 2010 and actually used by the Defendant until January 21, 2014, and the post office account opened on March 17, 2014 and used by the Defendant by April 3, 2014, respectively.
In addition, according to the investigation report (the attachment to the judgment of suspended sentence for the same kind of crime as the suspect A), the above suspended sentence is judged.