2. There are extenuating circumstances, such as that the Defendant’s decision on the grounds of appeal reflects his/her mistake and agreed with the victims.

However, on the other hand, the Defendant continued to commit the instant crime even though he had been punished several times due to the same crime, and the lower court appears to have determined the penalty by reducing the summary order of a total of one million won by taking into account the above favorable circumstances of the Defendant, taking into account the following favorable circumstances, and there are no extenuating circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered in newly sentencing after the lower judgment was sentenced, and other circumstances that form the conditions for the argument and sentencing as indicated in the record of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., even if considering all the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as grounds for appeal, it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment should be reversed, so the Defendant’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.