견책결정취소
1. On October 16, 2013, the Defendant filed a claim seeking revocation of the disposition of salary reduction of 2013-250 between the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s Intervenor.
1. Circumstances for the review and decision of this case;
A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) is a school juristic person operating the Taeduk University, etc.
On March 1, 1991, the Plaintiff was employed as a full-time lecturer at Taeduk University on April 1, 1994, and was promoted as an associate professor on April 1, 2002, as an associate professor on April 1, 2002, and as a professor on May 1, 201.
B. On July 4, 2013, an intervenor took disciplinary action against the Plaintiff for two months of salary reduction pursuant to Article 61(1) of the Private School Act and Articles 3, 4, and 7 of the Regulations on the Service of the Faculty and Staff for the following reasons:
(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”. 1. From December 2009 to August 201, the Plaintiff entered the Gangwon-gun casino located in Gangwon-gun, Gangwon-gun, which was 12 times in total and engaged in speculative gambling.
Although the Plaintiff, as a professor, must fulfill its duty of good faith and responsibility, the Plaintiff entered casino habitually, failed to fulfill its duty as a professor, and left the place of work.
Even if the Plaintiff entered a casino in Gangwon-do during the school period, it can be deemed that he left the place of work in a situation that he has to be faithful to the academic affairs, including the entrance and exit activities, and violated his duty or neglected his duties. In addition, frequent casino entry as a teacher who did not fulfill his duty as an exemplary and a prize, regardless of the reasons, is suspected of habitual nature, and frequent casino entry as a professor is not likely to violate his dignity as a professor, as an act that a professor loses trust from students and is unable to practice witness education.
(A) On February, 200, the Intervenor demanded the Plaintiff to submit a written confirmation of the details of access to the Gangseoland for accurate confirmation and personal rescue, but the Plaintiff refused to submit a written confirmation in violation of privacy and personal information.
This is a non-responsibilityd statement as a professor, and the intervenor's legitimate order of service.