However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 20, 2018, the Defendant forced indecent act: (a) requested the victim to be aware of the victim D (Woo, 48 years of age) at the marina business establishment operated by Pyeongtaek-si C on or around 23:00; (b) was refused; (c) was in the state of being out of the victim’s face; (d) was in the state of being out of the one-time panty panty; and (e) was in the state of being out of the victim’s face three times at the panty; and (e) was in the state of having the victim face “I

If the dial-a-a-art is changed as soon as possible, and if the dial-a-art is changed, it shall not be the dial-a-a-art, nis shall not be the

The term "referring to "the victim" and "the victim's arms are humpingly and tried to do so, and the victim was forced to commit an indecent act by scambling several times.

2. Whether the injured defendant committed a crime against the victim E (the husband of D, who is the husband of D, who follows the defendant's happiness at the time, date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as "the victim"), who is the husband of D, who is the victim of D, who is the husband of the defendant's happiness."

B. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

Racker tin(packer)

Moroca Doz.

It is not a dead case.

In doing so, “the victim’s face and joints of the victim’s face were taken in drinking, and the victim was injured by a non-thring of the body that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court) (the victim D is not entitled to accept the defendant's and his defense counsel's assertion that the victim did not forcibly commit an indecent act, such as the victim's statement, since the victim's statement was credibility, considering that the victim's statement was made in light of this court and investigation agency's perception at the time when the victim's body was leaked, the content of the damage, the situation before and after the crime, and the defendant's behavior at the time of the victim's indecent act.