When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant shall be the chairperson of the senior citizen center in substantial Gu C in the Gu, and the E and the victim F are the members of the senior citizen center.

On October 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, stating that “I would have a relation with I and I would have known that I would have come to know of the relationship with I, because I would have a defect in the relationship with I and I would have come to know of the relationship with I, and that I would have 20,000 won in the amount of money.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. Each legal statement of witness K and L;

1. Each police statement of F and H (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not make any statement like the above facts charged at the hearing of G and H, and G also made a statement to the purport that it conforms to the defendant's defense. However, in the case of G's statement, it is doubtful that the defendant's statement of H's investigative agency and this court that he made the statement like the above facts charged is not only concrete and consistent, but also it seems that the above H does not have any motive to make a false statement against the defendant, in light of the fact that the defendant's statement and the remaining evidence of H sufficiently recognized the fact that he injured the victim's reputation as shown in the facts charged in this case) is applied to the law.

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;