except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 22:00 on September 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) took part in the verbal dispute between E and F, and expressed the Defendant’s desire at the house of the C located in Seosan City B, and (b) took part in the verbal dispute between E and F, and (c) took part in the victim’s desire, the Defendant laid down the victim’s bomba for about eight (8) weeks of treatment by putting the victim’s her blick with her head debt with her blurging and pushing the her head debt and her blurging the blurg.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A copy of each medical certificate or medical record;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the photograph of the complainant;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing below) of the suspended sentence is not less than that of the injury inflicted on the victim, the defendant reflects his fault, and since March 200, the fact that the defendant has no same criminal record as the defendant has no same criminal record should be considered in favor of the defendant, and the defendant's age, economic form, and circumstances leading to the crime of this case should be considered in light of the various conditions of sentencing indicated in the records of this case, such as the defendant's age, economic form,

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.