However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around February 26, 2014, the Defendant expressed that, in the operation of the Defendant in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant: “Around February 26, 2014, in the course of talking about the residence of the Defendant, children, and her husband’s business, etc., the victim D with an excessive re-fluence, “it was about KRW 70,000,000 if he/she made a disposition that he/she had been able to make the operation of the Republic of Korea so that he/she would have been able to make the operation of the Republic of Korea, and he/she would pay 15,00,000,000 if he/she did not return well, he/she did not pay 15,00,000 won if he/she borrowed money

However, the above C was leased under the name of the Defendant’s father and used the leased deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000 as collateral and used the Defendant’s gambling debts, etc. to repay the Defendant’s gambling debts, etc. However, even if it was impossible to pay monthly rent at once, the amount equivalent to KRW 70,00,000 cannot be refunded even if it was disposed of at the time due to the deduction of monthly rent.

In addition, there was a deficit in the amount of KRW 8,00,000 from 7,00 per month to 7,000 per month in relation to the operation of the business, and at the same time, the debt of KRW 30,000 was accumulated, and there was no intention or ability to repay even if there was no other property or income to borrow money from the victim.

Around February 27, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 14,550,000 from the victim, deducting KRW 550,00 from the Defendant’s corporate bank account in the name of his/her father and wife E.

2. Around August 10, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would lend money to the victim D to the effect that “I will immediately repay the money in return for the reduction of the three-month interest that is not paid off each month.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the above even if he borrowed money from the victim as stated in the above paragraph 1.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 6,00,000 from the victim on August 28, 2014, and received KRW 6,00,000 from the victim on August 28, 2014.