The defendant is living together with the victim C (V, 52 years of age) in a multilateral bank located in Chungcheongnam-do for about three years before the year.

On March 18, 2016, at around 20:05, the Defendant, in the residence of the victim in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, on the ground that the victim had drinking together with the victim, refused to lend money from his her her her her her son, and the Defendant, with the kitchen gate (33cm in total length, 20cm in length on the day) which is a dangerous thing in the kitchen, her strings the victim's left arms, her head can be taken by a fluent disease, which is a dangerous thing on the floor continuously, and when the victim's face can be taken by drinking, the Defendant inflicted an injury, such as the victim's upper left arms on the number of days of treatment, the snow in the snow, and the surrounding string in the snow.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the witness C;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Part of the statement protocol made by the prosecution against C;

1. Statement in the police statement protocol with respect to F and G;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that each description or image [the defendant's personal injury was inflicted upon the victim's face by drinking at the scene, a list of seized articles, a photograph of seized articles, a photo of the earth unit, a field photo taken by a police officer of the earth unit, a criminal investigation report (in addition to the victim's photograph), a criminal investigation report (in addition to an additional statement about the arrest of a police officer of the site), and a criminal investigation report (in addition to an additional statement about the arrest of a police officer of the scene), it is sufficient to say that the defendant's personal injury was inflicted on the victim

The following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, i.e., (i) the victim: (a) in this Court, “the defendant knife knife the victim’s arms” and “the defendant’s knife knife knife the victim’s arms” are not memory; (b) the police officers called out and knife in the toilet after the call.

“The Defendant has made a statement to the effect that it is, while being investigated by the prosecution,” and “the Defendant is at his own will.