If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On July 6, 2013, at around 00:45, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) as a matter of time with his/her employees and alcohol value from “F in the operation of the Victim E (M, 49 years of age) in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City,” C scambling the E cambs, and “scambling without the drinking value,” and “Necaming without the drinking value.” The Defendant scam written a bath to “Ne how he/she reported my/herself.” The Defendant scamed and scamed the alcohol soldiers on theme, and scamed and scamed them to the customers who were cambling.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force for about 30 minutes.

2. Around 01:20 on 06. 06. 06. 01:20, the Defendant: (a) stated that “I am h (29 years old),” “I am h (29 years old), who was dispatched to the site after receiving 112 reports from the “F,” and “I am h (I am h am mar, I am mar, I am mar, I am mar, I am mar, I am mar, I am. I am mar, I am, I am, I am, I am. I am am bit B, I am bit B, I am bit B, I am bit B, I am am bit B, I am am, I am. I am am am, I am am, I am, I am, I am you am you am... I am you am you am........”

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C to publicly insult the victim H.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning H;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and H

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 311 and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.