If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On May 14, 2013, from around 19:20 to 21:20 the same day, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) placed the victim requesting food value at the D restaurant operated by the victim C (at the age of 47) in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu; (b) placed an order of food equivalent to the total market value of KRW 18,00,00, such as alcohol and alcohol, in the D restaurant operated by the victim C (at the age of 47).

The reason that the cash 60,000 won in one’s inner wall does not exist between the two, was that “Yice, I would like to ask money to the extent that I would know. I would like to go through the retail shop in the restaurant. I would like to go through the restaurant. I would like to see that I would have been able to satis, I would like to get this satis, I would like to get a satis, and I would like to get a satis. I would like to get a satis, and I would like to get a satis for about two hours.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On May 14, 2013, at the F District District of the Daegu Police Station, the Defendant voluntarily accompanied the police officer G to the cases described in the preceding paragraph at the F District District of the Daegu Police Station, Seogu, Seogu, Daegu, Daegu, on May 14, 2013, in order to identify the Defendant’s personal information that he/she was seated in the district, he/she expressed that he/she “I suly impe........” without any justifiable reason, he/she sawd him/her one time with his/her left hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of police officer G's duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A C statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a CCTV screen which contains a face of violence against a police officer);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;