"2014 Highest 216"

1. On February 21, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectives, deadly weapons, etc., damage) around 17:55 on February 21, 2014, around D, which was located in Gangnam-gun C, Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-do, the Defendant: (a) resisted the Defendant that the victim E (the age of 47) claimed by the Defendant and the victim’s wife; (b) burnedd the Defendant; (c) inserted articles that were dangerous in the victim’s house flick; and (d) landed the Defendant’s fl

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and damaged 717,484 won of repairing fees.

2. In the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) and at the same place, the Defendant: (a) sent a 112 victim’s report on the said damage; and (b) sent a 2-day image of head and neck that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim by a cigarette frighting the victim’s left wirls; and (c) the victim’s head and neck

around 06:00 on July 28, 2014, the Defendant received a request from the victim G (the age of 67) who was the owner of the house (the age of 67) who was under the influence of alcohol in the Defendant’s monthly rent room F of Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 28, 2014 that he would be able to get her her her her fright, and her her her fright to her her fright to her her fright to her fright

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the first mady bones, etc., which requires medical treatment for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 216]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A report on investigation and a written diagnosis of injury (2014 highest 353);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (1) 2 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act as to the crime, Article 3 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent offenders, it appears that there is a high risk of violence against the accused for the reason of sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 (within the scope of adding up each maximum term of punishment) of the Criminal Act, and the judgment is made.