1. Fraud against the victim D [2018 Highest 442] The Defendant did not have the intent or ability to issue a permanent residence certificate to the victim D in F Kafin located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, on July 11, 2011, even though he did not have the intent or ability to issue a permanent residence certificate to the victim D, the amount of money to KRW 20 million is paid.

It is expected to issue a permanent residence certificate of KRW 20 million to the Republic of Korea.

“Along with the false statement,” the defrauded transferred KRW 9 million from the damaged person’s H account (I) to the H account in the G name, KRW 4 million to the same account on July 13, 201, and KRW 500,000 to the same account on August 3, 2011 and KRW 13.5 million to the same account on August 3, 201.

2. Fraud against the victim J [2018 Godan 8] The Defendant may benefit from the Defendant’s cafeteria operated by the victim J on February 18, 2014 at a restaurant operated by the victim J in the North-gu Seoul Northern-gu, Gwangju, with the victim’s “assortu in a Tong Young-gu warehouse by purchasing the mortu, and store the mortu in the mortu in the mortu warehouse

The profit will be paid at the time of lending money.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant received the investment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the agreed profit to the injured party by trading the fishery products.

As above, the Defendant, as from March 24, 2014, received transfer of KRW 10 million from the victim to the victim on March 24, 2014, from September 1, 2016, the Defendant, as well as from September 1, 2016, received a total of KRW 86 million from the victim on a total of 12 occasions, as shown in attached Table 1.

3. Fraud against the victim L [2018 highest 442] The Defendant needs to pay money to the victim L in a “N” restaurant located in the North-gu Seoul metropolitan city, Gwangju, about August 5, 2014, to procure the volume due to the lack of the quantity to be supplied to the customer.

When delivering money to the customer, the sum of interest paid to the customer shall be paid.

“A false representation was made.”

However, at the time, the defendant was unable to resolve the investment money received from another person, and even if he receives money from the injured party, it is a living fee.