When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 24, 2016, around 22:31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to pay taxi expenses and invite the Defendant to return home from C in the circumstances belonging to the Daegu Gangnam Police Station B District, which the Defendant called up after receiving a 112 report that the Defendant would not pay a taxi fee; (b) stated that “I am out of police officers. I am h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h,

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine (including the fact that the defendant has no record of the same kind of crime, and the police officer who suffered damage wishes to take the defendant's wife against the defendant

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;