1. On December 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) found in a drunken state at the inn police box B, which was under the influence of alcohol, and (b) Da and the security guards E, who had been working there, have been tried at a court today by the court. Due to the scars, the Defendant was under the suspension of execution of internal execution. (c) Dominatedd D by taking the attitude that she would be able to sarbling with her flaps, and her flaps by taking the attitude that she would be sarbling and drinking. (d) Dominated D.

Since then, the Defendant: (a) took a bath from E in the process of intending to smoke in a small wave; (b) assaulted E in the process of breaking the breath by putting the ballebbb, etc. into the bals.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the situation service of police officers in relation to the protection of the life, body, and property of the people.

2. The Defendant, who was arrested as a flagrant offender with the same content as Paragraph 1, was arrested and released as a flagrant offender with the obstruction of performance of official duties, was examined and released by the Innish Police Station, and subsequently, on December 6, 2013, at around 00:50, the Defendant re-exploited into the place specified in Paragraph 1, and took a bath to E, stating, “Chose, the age of the Defendant, several times,” and assaulted with her hand, when her breathm.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the situation service of police officers in relation to the protection of the life, body, and property of the people.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or A;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Among concurrent crimes, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act are pening the defendant's wrong facts. However, the instant crime is found in the police box back to the police box, even though the defendant committed violence to the victimized police officers and arrested him as a flagrant offender after being released.