손해배상(기)
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff (appointed party), the appointed party B, and C are dismissed.
2. The expansion from the trial.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: Gap, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20 evidence submitted by the plaintiff at the trial, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion; and Gap, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, and 20 evidence (including each number), and the claims expanded in the trial at the trial are as stated in the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional determination, they are cited as it is in accordance
2. The Plaintiff was a subscriber of a customized welfare system in 2008. The Plaintiff asserted to the purport that the Defendant was not paid KRW 7,285,120, which could have been paid according to the above group insurance by failing to undergo surgery at a timely time on November 2008, due to the erroneous diagnosis of the Plaintiff’s symptoms in violation of the duty of care in the course of treatment against the Plaintiff. As seen earlier, the Plaintiff did not appear to have been negligent in diagnosing the Plaintiff’s symptoms to the military officers affiliated with the Defendant, as seen earlier. Moreover, there was no evidence that the Defendant was a person liable to pay insurance proceeds from the above group insurance. The Plaintiff’s assertion appears to have no reason to see any mother or any ground.
3. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals filed by the plaintiff, the designated parties B, and C are dismissed as it is without merit, and the plaintiff's claims expanded in the trial are also dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.