beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.01.17 2019고단2920

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Evidence 1, 2 (Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office No. 2019No. 1572), No. 1, 2.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant conspiredd to induce a victim by deceiving him/her by means of a phishing referring to the phishing of his/her name and a person in an infinite name, thereby inducing the victim to withdraw money. The Defendant is a member of the Financial Supervisory Service, who is the victim’s employee, and the Defendant conspired to deliver the money to the account designated by the winners of his/her name after receiving the money from the victim and receiving the money from the victim.

1. On May 14, 2019, the Defendant conspiredd as above, and forged six copies of the document under the name of the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission, a public document document, by printing out the forged public document file using a computer installed at a place to the Financial Services Commission for the purpose of exercising a false information on the Defendant’s mobile phone name from the Defendant’s cell phone name in the PC bank near Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 102-ro, to the Defendant’s mobile phone name in the name of the Financial Services Commission.

Accordingly, the defendant forged a public document in collusion with a person with no name or a person with no name.

2. On May 22, 2019, the Defendant recruited the Defendant as above, and on the phone called to the victim B on May 14:00, 2019, the Defendant introduced himself as Seoul Central District Court C investigator of high-tech crime C, and “The passbook in the name of the party was used for financial fraud crimes and the warrant of detention was issued. It is necessary to collect money to confirm the property, and then deliver it to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service.”

However, there was no fact that the passbook in the name of the victim was used in the crime of fraud, or a warrant of detention was issued to the victim.

Nevertheless, as above, the person who was dissatisfying the name of the victim could induce the victim to withdraw KRW 11,400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from May 23, 2019.