The plaintiff is attached Form 1.3,015 square meters among the 3,015 square meters inHanam-si owned by the defendant.

A. On November 15, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased 1,670 square meters in Do (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”); and E purchased 994 square meters in 1,670 square meters in 200,000 in 200,000,000 in 200,000,000 in 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

Since then, the land owned by the Plaintiff was changed on April 17, 2015, and on May 18, 2015, the land category of the land owned by the Plaintiff was changed into “former” respectively.

B. The Defendant owns the said C 3,015 square meters and the said G 1,296 square meters located immediately adjacent to the land of the F 994 square meters prior to the Hanam-si owned by E.

(hereinafter referred to as “Defendant-owned land”) 3,015 square meters in C.

On the other hand, there is a bank road with a width of 2 to 3 meters on the north-east side of the Plaintiff, E, and the Defendant’s land and the north-east side of G, and there is a bank road not packed across each of the above land and river (hereinafter “the above bank road”), and the part of the road in this case where the land owned by the Defendant was passed is referred to as “the part of the dispute in this case”), and the end part of the road in this case’s south-east side of the road in this case.

(hereinafter “the instant contribution”). D.

Plaintiff

In order to go through the part of the dispute of this case in the owned land and to go through the public road of this case, as shown in the attached Form 3, B passes through the packing road connected to B at the end of the northwest of the road of this case and passing through the underground passage B, and passing through the underground passage K, and the underground passage A after passing through the underground passage A, as shown in the attached Form 3.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant roundway”). E.

In the original land owned by the Plaintiff, a vinyl house was installed for dry field farming, but the Plaintiff acquired ownership, and then removed the vinyl house and performed the banking work.

The plaintiff asked the lessee of the land owned by the defendant to remove part of the plastic houses installed in the dispute of this case for the passage of large cargo vehicles, such as dump trucks for banking construction.

thereafter;