However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 16, 2015, the Defendant reported an advertisement that provides a loan via the Internet, and made a telephone finance broker and a telephone call, and notified the Defendant’s bank account (B) number at the request of the assistant staff.

Accordingly, around 09:00 on April 17, 2015, the telephone financial fraud assistance officers misrepresented the victim C with police officers, and walked a telephone to transfer money to another passbook because it is used in the crime. The Defendant bank opened a new bank account in the name of the party, and transferred money to all other passbooks. In addition, the Internet banking ID ID andOTP number, etc. are known to the victim. The Defendant bank account in the name of the victim. The Defendant bank transferred KRW 470,200,00 from the SC bank account in the name of the victim to the account.

On the other hand, around April 17, 2015, the Defendant received a proposal that “The Defendant would pay KRW 1,800,000 to 1,80,000 to her own bank account by withdrawing the money deposited to her own bank account from her own bank account from among the telephone financial intermediary employees in the area of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Seodong, and then received KRW 47,000,000 from her own bank account at around 13:21 on the same day, at around 13:21 on the same day, the Defendant released KRW 1,80,000, out of the money deposited to her own bank account in cash and delivered it to the telephone financial intermediary staff, and in return, received KRW 1,80,000 from her telephone financial intermediary staff.

As a result, the defendant inputs illegal orders into computer and other information processing systems, or inputs information without authority.