beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.06.08 2016고정144

주민등록법위반

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000, respectively.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From February 22, 2014, the same year is applicable to A

8. A person who was in a de facto marital relationship with C until 13. Defendant B is a person who was in a de facto marital relationship with C, and Defendant A and a person who was in a university.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime Defendant A was in a de facto marital relationship as above around August 27, 2014.

As C and was different, C’s credit card use details are checked to identify the location, and Defendant B and his female were aware of in advance as C.

Using C's resident registration number to verify C's credit card use details.

A. On August 27, 2014, Defendant A was aware in advance to Defendant B of the crime.

C The Defendant B notified the C’s resident registration number on August 27, 2014, around 10:02, around 10:11, and around 11:15, around three occasions, Defendant B sent his name and resident registration number to the C’s non-name counselor who asked C’s name and resident registration number in order to verify the content of the card use after calls to the National Card Customer Center using the women’s house phone call, which is the women’s residence, at around 10:15, around three times. In order to verify the content of the card use, Defendant B sent his name and resident registration number to C, and transferred the details of the use from the above non-name counselor.

B. On August 28, 2014, Defendant B called the National Card Customer Center using his/her home phone phone at around 09:20 on August 28, 2014, in order to change the mobile phone numbers from among the customer information of Defendant B to the mobile phone numbers of Defendant A, Defendant B provided counseling to Defendant B, while asking his/her name and resident registration number to confirm himself/herself, Defendant B provided C’s name and non-resident registration number to the name-based counselor, and had the above name-based counselor change the mobile phone numbers from among the customer information of Defendant B to the mobile phone numbers of Defendant A.

(c)

Defendant B committed on September 1, 2014 at the same residence around September 1, 2014.