However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the execution of punishment shall be suspended.

On May 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 00:10 on May 7, 2016, the Defendant: (b) around 00:10, while drinking the Victim D (44 years of age) and drinking the alcohol in the “C dan”); (c) on the ground that the victim paid the drinking value to women who drink the drinking in the table table on the side table, he saw the victim’s head as a beer disease, which is a dangerous object on the table table, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as an open room for two weeks, which requires two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant’s legal statement

D Application of 7 copies of the police statement, 1 photographic, 1 copy of the photograph, and 1 copy of the statute

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

2. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

4. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant had a lot of records of punishment as an act of violence, and thus, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the grounds of minor negligence, resulting in an injury to the victim by getting the head of the victim from beer disease.

Provided, That the punishment shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant due to his/her friendship and that the defendant reflects the mistake.