손해배상(기)
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
3. The plaintiff S, T, U, and V in the trial.
1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows: (a) the relevant part of the judgment of the court of the first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance, in addition to the use of the following part of the judgment of the court of the first instance as stated in paragraph (2). Therefore, it is citing
2. The following shall be added to the succession relationship in Section 4(iii) above:
4 On the other hand, A died on July 31, 2013 while the lawsuit of this case was pending, and as his heir, C, U, and V taken over the lawsuit by Plaintiff C, U, and V, the wife of Plaintiff S, U, and V.
10,000,000 won for each parent and child respectively shall be 10,000 won for each parent and child, and 5,000,000 won for punishment.
The "attached Form 4" of the 10th page shall be written in the following as shown in the "Inheritance Relationship and the Amount of Damage."
Part 10 "(c)" shall be written in accordance with the following subparagraphs:
Ultimately, the Defendant, as consolation money, has a duty to dispute over the existence and scope of the Defendant’s obligation to the Plaintiff, 11,249,99, 15,65 won for each of the 15,776 won for Plaintiff C, 13,527,776 won for Plaintiff C, 10,361,110 won for Plaintiff E, 48,958,32 won for Plaintiff F, and 18,124,99 won for each of them from July 25, 2014, which is the date of closing the argument in the first instance trial, to dispute over the existence and scope of the obligation to the Defendant from July 25, 2014 to September 17, 2014, which is the date of the pronouncement of the first instance trial, and to pay damages for delay by 20% per annum as prescribed by the Civil Act for the promotion of litigation, etc.
3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is based on the plaintiff S, T, U, and V's lawsuit acceptance in the court of first instance and the defendant in accordance with the order of the judgment of the court of first instance.