국가유공자등록거부처분취소
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The plaintiff's primary claim is dismissed.
B. The Defendant’s September 2010
1. Details of the disposition;
A. From February 1, 2003, the Plaintiff served as an employee of the Secretariat of the Election Commission (hereinafter “Election Commission”).
B. On September 22, 2003, the Plaintiff was ordered to attend a meeting held by the Yangyang-gun Election Commission and was traveling a car (B) and was traveling a business trip. At around 13:50 on the same day, at around 13:50 on the same day, the Plaintiff was faced with a traffic suspension signal and stopped on the crosswalk stop line. Accordingly, the Plaintiff was faced with a traffic accident where the part of the front-hand part of the said car (E) on the front-hand part of the said car (hereinafter “instant accident”).
C. On June 18, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with a person who rendered distinguished services to the State, alleging that the Plaintiff suffered from the scambling escape certificate, the scambling escape certificate, and the scambling escape certificate (hereinafter “instant wounds”) due to the shock caused by the instant accident.
B. On September 1, 2010, the Defendant was subject to a traffic accident on October 24, 200, which was three years prior to the occurrence of the instant accident, and obtained approval from the Public Official Pension Service for medical treatment for official duties on the “brain cele, 3-4, and 5-6 conical signboard escape certificate,” and thus, the instant difference is difficult to be considered as an injury due to the instant accident. The symptoms shown in the Plaintiff’s trend and the critical trend after the instant accident were blick kids without any pressure for the instant accident, and thus, rejected the Plaintiff’s registration of a person of distinguished service to the State (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
[Grounds for recognition] The items of evidence Nos. 1 and 31 and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement’s examiners and medical advisers on the primary claim are the medical document that served as the basis for the instant disposition (No. 4).